See which Presidential candidates match your personal beliefs
Take the quiz!
The worlds #1 voting guide for 79,350,597 politically engaged citizens
Here is the current rank of the most important political issues for American voters.
Here are the stories making headlines in political news today.
@ISIDEWITH3mins3m
In an unprecedented move, the Trump campaign, in collaboration with the Republican National Committee (RNC), has announced plans to deploy over 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across key battleground states to monitor the vote counting process on Election Day. This massive mobilization effort underscores the campaign's focus on election integrity and its determination to safeguard the electoral process from what it perceives as potential fraud and irregularities. The initiative is part of a broader strategy to ensure transparency and fairness in the election, reflecting growing concerns among some segments of the electorate regarding the integrity of the voting process.The decision to deploy such a large contingent of poll watchers and legal personnel is indicative of the highly contentious nature of the upcoming election, with both sides preparing for a closely fought battle. The Trump campaign's emphasis on election monitoring comes in the wake of the 2020 election, which was marred by baseless allegations of widespread voter fraud. These claims, although unsubstantiated, have fueled a significant push towards implementing stricter voting regulations and oversight mechanisms.Critics of the plan argue that the deployment of such a large number of poll watchers could lead to voter intimidation and suppression, particularly in minority communities. They contend that the presence of a vast army of monitors, many of whom may lack formal training in election law and procedures, could create an atmosphere of mistrust and fear, potentially deterring eligible voters from casting their ballots.Supporters of the initiative, however, argue that the presence of attorneys and volunteers is essential for preventing illegal voting practices and ensuring that the election results reflect the true will of the people. They maintain that rigorous monitoring of the vote counting process is necessary to protect the integrity of the election and to instill public confidence in the outcome.As Election Day approaches, the debate over the role of poll watchers and the impact of their presence at voting locations continues to intensify. With both sides of the political spectrum mobilizing their resources and preparing for a contentious electoral battle, the Trump campaign's plan to deploy a vast network of monitors represents a significant escalation in the ongoing struggle to define the future of American democracy.
@ISIDEWITH18mins18m
In a dramatic turn of events that underscores the deep divisions within the Republican Party, a group of far-right GOP members, led by Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), has initiated a bold move to oust House Speaker Mike Johnson. This unprecedented effort has thrust the House into a state of turmoil, with…
@ISIDEWITH1hr1H
In a striking turn of events, nearly 50 environmental leaders and activists, once colleagues of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), have publicly called for him to abandon his presidential bid. This group, which has worked closely with Kennedy on various environmental initiatives, is now taking a stand against his political aspirations, fearing his candidacy could inadvertently aid in the reelection of former President Donald Trump. Their concerns have culminated in a series of ads urging Kennedy to 'Honor our planet, drop out,' highlighting the gravity of their plea.Kennedy, known for his environmental advocacy, seems to have alienated some of his strongest allies with his decision to run for president. The environmental community, typically aligned in its efforts to combat climate change and promote sustainability, finds itself at odds over Kennedy's political ambitions. The call for his withdrawal is not just a reflection of political strategy but also an indication of the deep divisions within the environmental movement regarding the best path forward.The public campaign against Kennedy's candidacy underscores a broader debate within the environmental sector about the role of politics in achieving their goals. While some view political engagement as essential to enacting meaningful environmental policies, others worry that divisive figures like Kennedy could fracture the movement and detract from its core mission. This situation is a vivid example of how political ambitions can sometimes clash with advocacy goals, leading to unexpected rifts among longtime allies.Moreover, the opposition to Kennedy's presidential run from within his own ranks highlights the challenges that environmental activists face in maintaining a united front. As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the environmental movement is grappling with how best to influence policy and public opinion, a task made more complicated by internal disagreements over strategy and leadership.As this drama unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between environmental advocacy and political power. The activists' plea to Kennedy to prioritize the planet over personal political ambitions speaks to the broader challenges facing the environmental movement today. It remains to be seen how Kennedy will respond to this call to action and what impact it will have on his campaign and the environmental movement at large.
@ISIDEWITH3hrs3H
As local elections approach, the spotlight intensifies on the critical yet often overlooked aspects of the electoral process, particularly mail-in voting and the challenges it faces. Across various regions, the importance of ensuring that every vote counts has never been more emphasized, especially in the wake of recent controversies and allegations of fraud. With the deadline for mailing in ballots now passed, voters are urged to find alternative ways to ensure their ballots are submitted on time, highlighting the need for clear and accessible information on voting procedures.In addition to the complexities surrounding mail-in voting, local elections are drawing attention for their significant impact on communities. These elections, which often include decisions on local governance, school boards, and other critical issues, can have a direct and immediate effect on voters' daily lives. Despite this, they typically see lower voter turnout compared to national elections, underscoring the need for increased awareness and engagement from the public.Recent delays in implementing a pilot program for signature matching on mail-in ballots in some areas have raised concerns about the readiness and reliability of election systems. These delays, attributed to challenges in securing a suitable vendor, highlight the logistical difficulties in ensuring the integrity of mail-in voting. Such issues are crucial to address, as the authenticity of every vote is paramount in maintaining trust in the electoral process.Furthermore, allegations of forged signatures and election fraud in certain regions have cast a shadow over the electoral process, leading to heightened scrutiny and calls for stricter verification measures. These incidents serve as a reminder of the ongoing challenges in safeguarding elections against fraud, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in all aspects of voting.As voters navigate these complexities, the role of clear communication and robust election infrastructure becomes increasingly evident. Ensuring that every eligible voter can cast their ballot confidently and securely is essential for the health of democracy. As local elections approach, the collective effort to overcome these challenges will be a testament to the resilience and integrity of the electoral process.
@ISIDEWITH3hrs3H
China has established a new information warfare department under the direct command of its top military body as it begins its largest restructuring of the armed forces in more than eight years.The shift of information warfare to the direct command of the Central Military Commission — the top Communist party and state organ that controls the People’s Liberation Army — would hand Chinese leader Xi Jinping even more direct control over the military, analysts said.The Information Support Force will aim to “speed up military modernisation and effectively implement the mission of the people’s armed forces in the new era”, Xi said at a ceremony in Beijing on Friday. Xi’s last major PLA restructuring in 2015 moved key functions such as logistics, training and mobilisation directly under the command of the CMC, which he chairs.Combining cyber, information and space forces under the SSF was viewed as an attempt to create similar direct control.But experts on the Chinese military said that leaders had unwound that structure as a result of an incident last year in which a Chinese surveillance balloon was shot down by the US, as well as corruption investigations into generals and a failure to achieve synergies across the different divisions within the SSF.The military leadership has been experimenting with smaller reorganisations in recent years, suggesting that the 2015 reforms were not complete.
Here are the most active political discussions happening right now.
iSideWith offers voters a comprehensive platform to analyze and refine their political beliefs, enabling them to make more educated choices at the polls while staying updated on key issues.
How American voters rank the importance of top political issues over time.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Stay up-to-date on the most recent political news headlines, updated frequently.
Toggle your country setting to compare your political beliefs with other citizens, parties, and candidates around the world. Find out which issues other countries care about the most.
Here is the current rank of the most popular political ideologies for American voters.
iSideWith.com is a fully independent platform, free from any affiliation with investors, shareholders, political parties, or interest groups, ensuring unbiased assistance for voters in understanding and navigating political issues.
Here is a list of influential tweets promoting informed voting.
Educate yourself and make your OWN decision! http://t.co/yMmsYn5n
— Kim Kardashian (@KimKardashian) September 7, 2012
Helpful if u don't know what candidates you agree with most. https://t.co/Im12eem17o
— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) February 15, 2016
Don't be lazy- look **** up if ur not sure what it is!
Just took the political issues quiz at http://t.co/pZ6yi3if. http://t.co/ZWBYSEMi -- Not at all surprised I'm 95% w Gary Johnson.
— ʎǝɹɐƆ ʍǝɹᗡ (@DrewFromTV) October 28, 2012
A quiz to determine which candidates you side with. http://t.co/Vv9oUwKs
— Roger Ebert (@ebertchicago) October 31, 2012
http://t.co/JCOrsPc0 Shows You Which Candidate Should Get Your Vote http://t.co/gV9dwYmJ #ElectionDay2012
— Mashable (@mashable) November 6, 2012
Take the presidential election quiz and see which candidate you side with... #iSideWith http://t.co/kYR3F1hz You may surprise yourself!!!
— Sonja Morgan (@SonjatMorgan) September 9, 2012
Try this short quiz to see which political party you side with... http://t.co/TKyGu4Ovqz me: pic.twitter.com/hAGwL9vYs3
— Michael Arrington 🏴☠️ (@arrington) November 30, 2013
Still not sure who to vote for? Take this quiz and see which presidential candidate matches your opinions: http://t.co/gXhGsZTE
— Denver7 News (@DenverChannel) November 5, 2012
I Side With is a site that surveys you on political issues & picks the presidential candidate that is right for you! http://t.co/qegjCKD1
— MTV Insights (@MTVInsights) September 19, 2012
Presidential election quiz: http://t.co/osTWsPhX Exceptionally well done - marketers could learn a lot from this one.
— Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads) (@randfish) September 1, 2012
Check out http://t.co/7i0VlHgu to see which presidential candidate you most agree with on the issues. You might be surprised.
— Ralph Nader (@RalphNader) August 29, 2012
Find your candidate soulmate with http://t.co/Y07Hknln http://t.co/85Qmdkcr
— Guy Kawasaki (@GuyKawasaki) April 25, 2012
I side 91% with Jill Stein... http://t.co/RPt53b1V
— Lessig 🇺🇦 (@lessig) October 30, 2012