The following is a 3 message exchange between 3 users
Here’s a hypothetical for you. Imagine someone’s brain was removed and they were hooked up to a set of machines that kept them biologically alive. Is that a person deserving of rights? In other words, would unplugging the machines be considered murder? What if, instead of a set of machines, the subjects was hooked up to another, unambiguously alive person? What if that person could be harmed? Would that person have the right to end the procedure?
@9B9WG7D1yr1Y
If someone is in a coma (effectively braindead) and I walk in and shoot them, I will be in jail for murder faster than you could imagine.
If I was hooked up to someone without our consent, would I have the right to actively kill them? What about a baby dependent on their mother for literally everything? What about if the child has downs? Gas them because they are a drain on society. You kind of sound like a group I wouldn't want to be associated with.
If there were Siamese twins, would one be allowed to pay a dr to kill the other in any situation? What if they waited a few weeks and there would then be a viable procedure to successfully separate them?
And here I thought women were supposed to be compassionate and if they ruled the world we would have peace.
@TruthHurts1011yr1Y
Take 'em to task, fellow Patriot!
