Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @ISIDEWITH asked…30mins30m

Should the government fund research into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change?

  76reply

 @ISIDEWITH asked…15hrs15H

Should the government invest in programs to reduce food waste?

  69

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

Yes

  63

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

Yes

  63

 @ISIDEWITH asked…4hrs4H

Should the government provide subsidies for companies developing carbon capture technologies?

  53replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

Yes

  44

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

No

  14

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

No

  9

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...…15hrs15H

No

  5

 @9MJTP4Gfrom Guam  answered…29mins29m

Yes, but with caution and careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.

 @9MJQRL9 from Utah answered…4hrs4H

Not cosmetics. Medically legitimate testing ought to be determined by multiple accredited ethical review boards

 @9MJQRL9 from Utah answered…4hrs4H

Yes, but only after nationalizing/abolishing the industries responsible for carbon emissions and beginning a full-scale…

 @Politics_53 from Texas answered…7hrs7H

No, we should move towards car free and walk-able cities as that will help combat climate change and reducing our use of…

 @Politics_53 from Texas answered…7hrs7H

Yes but as long as the local environment is not compromised, the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives,…

 @9MJJC2V from California answered…10hrs10H

If carbon capture technology works, there needs to be a way to get rid of the carbon. If not, then one day its going to…

 @9MJH2MD from Michigan answered…12hrs12H

Yes, give more options for crude oil production rather than relying on the Middle East and skyrocketing prices

 @9MJGCR8 from Florida answered…12hrs12H

We should use human trials and provide a high level of pay and benefits, including housing and food for the recipients.

 @9MJ9HH6 from Minnesota answered…18hrs18H

Yes, but ban electric vehicles, they cost more carbon to produce than the average person would use driving in a gas powe…

 @9MJ7R8G from Pennsylvania answered…19hrs19H

I believe we should reduce them until these companies find less harmful ways to construct these wind farms.

 @9MJ7QZY from Oregon answered…19hrs19H

Yes, to an extent. Due to it's own environmental issues, it should not be the primary alternative... and should building…

 @9MJ724Q from Oregon answered…19hrs19H

If the vehicle is just sitting there not being used don't think it should be taxed but if its being used regularly and c…

 @9MJ6R9B from Indiana answered…20hrs20H

Probably not a good long-term idea. Provide incentives for greener solutions, but keep the oil as a backup plan. It work…

 @9MJ2CCS from Pennsylvania answered…23hrs23H

They probably should, but slowly. Over time they should transition to other energy means instead of instantly pulling ou…

 @9MJ27LB from Minnesota answered…23hrs23H

Maby it would be good for people with electric vehicles but don't spend everthing try and work on the ublic transport.

 @9MHZLGK from Florida answered…23hrs23H

The government should provide subsidies to taxpayers who buy American purchases valued over a large amount. Large amount…