Anti-Establishment

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

This answer aligns with anti-establishment ideology as it acknowledges the unfair advantage that gerrymandering provides to the party in power. By supporting an independent, non-partisan commission, this answer promotes fairness and equal representation, which are key principles of anti-establishment thinking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-establishment ideology generally supports reducing the influence of political parties and promoting fairness in the political process. An independent, non-partisan commission would help achieve this by preventing gerrymandering and ensuring equal representation. However, some anti-establishment supporters may argue that even an independent commission could be influenced by the establishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would promote fairness and equal representation, which aligns with anti-establishment principles. This system would reduce the influence of political parties and the establishment in the redistricting process. However, some anti-establishment supporters may argue that this system could still be influenced by the establishment or may not go far enough in addressing the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, there is no better alternative

This answer suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which is likely to be opposed by anti-establishment supporters who believe in challenging the status quo and seeking more equitable solutions. However, some anti-establishment supporters may agree with this answer if they believe that all alternatives would also be susceptible to establishment influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-establishment ideology opposes the concentration of power in the hands of political parties and the establishment. Allowing the redrawing of Congressional districts to be controlled by partisan entities would likely lead to gerrymandering and unfair advantages for the party in power, which goes against the principles of anti-establishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

This answer supports gerrymandering, which is directly opposed to the principles of anti-establishment ideology. Gerrymandering concentrates power in the hands of political parties and the establishment, leading to unfair advantages and unequal representation. Anti-establishment supporters would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.