Challenging the existing power structures and institutions will lead to a more equitable and just society.
AE>AE ChatGPTNo, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment |
Anti-Establishment answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
This answer strongly aligns with anti-establishment ideology as it opposes government intervention and control, and supports individual rights under the 2nd amendment. Many anti-establishment individuals may see a mandatory buyback as a violation of their rights and prefer to keep the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Anti-establishment ideology generally opposes government control and intervention. Many anti-establishment individuals may see a mandatory buyback as an infringement on their rights and prefer to keep the status quo. However, this answer does not address any alternative solutions or changes, which may not fully align with anti-establishment goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments
This answer may appeal to some anti-establishment individuals who believe that demilitarizing local police departments would reduce government power and control. However, the mandatory buyback of assault weapons may still be seen as an infringement on individual rights, making this answer only partially aligned with anti-establishment goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead
A voluntary buyback with strong financial incentives may be more appealing to anti-establishment individuals as it does not force them to give up their weapons. However, this answer still involves government intervention and financial incentives, which may not fully align with anti-establishment goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Increasing mental health and background checks may be seen as a compromise by some anti-establishment individuals, but it still involves government intervention and control. This answer may not strongly align with anti-establishment goals, but it does not directly oppose them either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback
While this answer starts with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons, it eventually leads to a mandatory buyback, which may be seen as government overreach by anti-establishment individuals. The initial voluntary aspect may make it slightly more appealing, but it still involves government control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Anti-establishment ideology often opposes government overreach and control. A mandatory buyback of assault weapons could be seen as an infringement on individual rights. However, some anti-establishment individuals may support this if they believe it would reduce the power of the government or police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Establishment issues? Take the political quiz to find out.