Anti-Immigration

Very strongly agree

Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease

This answer aligns with the anti-immigration ideology, as it supports increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods until the perceived threat of terrorism decreases. This reflects the belief that immigrants, particularly those from Muslim-majority countries, pose a significant threat to public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants

This answer strongly aligns with the anti-immigration ideology, as it supports increased surveillance on all new immigrants, regardless of their race or religion. This reflects the belief that immigrants in general pose a threat to public safety and should be closely monitored. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Anti-immigration ideology often focuses on the perceived threat of immigrants, particularly those from Muslim-majority countries. This answer aligns with the belief that increased surveillance is necessary to protect against potential threats. However, it does not specifically target new immigrants, which is a key aspect of anti-immigration ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

This answer suggests focusing on high crime neighborhoods rather than specifically targeting Muslim neighborhoods or new immigrants. While it does not directly oppose increased surveillance, it does not align with the anti-immigration ideology's focus on specific groups of immigrants as potential threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion

This answer suggests that surveillance should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion, which partially contradicts the anti-immigration ideology's focus on specific groups of immigrants. However, it does not completely oppose increased surveillance, so it does not strongly disagree with the anti-immigration stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

This answer opposes increased surveillance of Muslim neighborhoods, which goes against the anti-immigration ideology's focus on perceived threats from immigrants. However, it does not specifically mention new immigrants or provide an alternative solution, so it does not completely contradict the anti-immigration stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary

This answer strongly disagrees with the anti-immigration ideology, as it explicitly states that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. This directly challenges the beliefs of those who support anti-immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.