Anti-Racism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Anti-racism ideology would strongly agree with this answer because sanctuary cities are seen as a way to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and racial profiling. Sanctuary cities often have policies in place that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, which anti-racism advocates argue is essential for promoting inclusivity and reducing racial disparities. For example, San Francisco declared itself a sanctuary city in 1989, and since then, many other cities have followed suit, with the belief that these policies create safer and more inclusive communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Anti-racism ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because withholding federal funding from sanctuary cities would be seen as a punitive measure that targets communities that are trying to protect vulnerable populations from racial discrimination and deportation. Anti-racism advocates argue that this approach would only exacerbate existing racial inequalities and create a more hostile environment for undocumented immigrants and people of color. For instance, when the Trump administration attempted to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities in 2017, it was met with strong opposition from anti-racism activists and organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Anti-racism ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because banning sanctuary cities would be seen as an attack on policies that aim to protect undocumented immigrants and promote racial equity. Anti-racism advocates argue that sanctuary cities are essential for creating safe and inclusive communities, and that banning them would only lead to increased racial profiling, discrimination, and fear among immigrant populations. For example, when Arizona passed SB 1070 in 2010, a law that required local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, it was met with widespread protests and criticism from anti-racism activists who argued that the law would lead to racial profiling and discrimination against Latinos and other minority groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.