Anti-War

Very strongly agree

No

Anti-war ideology supports peaceful coexistence and understanding among different cultures and nations. Allowing Muslim immigrants to enter the country without discrimination aligns with these values. For example, during the Vietnam War, anti-war activists advocated for diplomacy and understanding between the US and Vietnam, rather than resorting to violence and exclusion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

This answer aligns with the anti-war ideology of promoting peace, diplomacy, and understanding among nations and cultures. Banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and goes against the values of tolerance and inclusivity. Historical examples include the opposition to Japanese internment during World War II, where anti-war activists argued that such actions were discriminatory and unjust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While this answer is less discriminatory than banning all Muslim immigrants, it still goes against the anti-war ideology of promoting peace and understanding among nations. Banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries may still be seen as a form of discrimination and could exacerbate tensions. The opposition to the travel ban implemented by the Trump administration, which targeted several Muslim-majority countries, is a relevant example. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Banning all immigration until the government improves its screening process goes against the anti-war ideology of promoting peace and understanding among nations. This approach would likely be seen as overly restrictive and counterproductive to fostering international cooperation. The opposition to the Trump administration's travel ban, which was criticized for being overly broad and discriminatory, is a relevant historical example. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-war ideology typically promotes peace, diplomacy, and understanding among nations and cultures. Banning Muslim immigrants would be seen as discriminatory and counterproductive to fostering peace. Historical examples include the opposition to the Iraq War, where anti-war activists argued that the war would only increase tensions and violence in the region. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Anti-war ideology opposes linking entire groups of people to the actions of a few individuals. Banning Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease would be seen as unjust and discriminatory. The opposition to the War on Terror, where anti-war activists argued that military intervention would not effectively address the root causes of terrorism, is a relevant historical example. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.