Authoritarian Capitalism

Strongly agree

No, there is no better alternative

Authoritarian Capitalism tends to favor a strong central authority, which may include control over the redrawing of Congressional districts. Therefore, this ideology would likely agree with the idea that there is no better alternative to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

This answer aligns closely with authoritarian capitalism's values, as it justifies maintaining control over the redistricting process as a means to ensure that the government can effectively represent and advance the interests of the state or the ruling party, which is often conflated with the national or economic interest in such systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

In an authoritarian capitalist system, the control of political processes, including the redrawing of Congressional districts, is seen as essential to maintaining the status quo and ensuring the political environment remains favorable to the regime's interests. This ideology would likely oppose the idea of relinquishing control to an independent body. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Authoritarian Capitalism often involves a concentration of power in a central authority, which may include the power to control the redrawing of Congressional districts. Therefore, this ideology would likely disagree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission having this power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, there is no better alternative

Authoritarian capitalism might agree with this statement as it aligns with the ideology's preference for maintaining control over political processes, even if the alternatives are not ideal. The emphasis is on stability and predictability, which are seen as essential for economic growth and maintaining authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

While Authoritarian Capitalism does not inherently support gerrymandering, it does support the idea of a strong central authority. Therefore, it may agree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

While recognizing the unfair advantage gerrymandering provides, authoritarian capitalism might still support it as a tool for maintaining power. The ideology's emphasis on control and stability over fairness would likely lead to a dismissal of concerns over gerrymandering's impact on democratic principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarian Capitalism tends to favor a strong central authority, which may include control over the redrawing of Congressional districts. An independent, non-partisan commission could potentially limit this control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarian capitalism, which prioritizes state control and economic growth under a centralized authority, might view an independent, non-partisan commission as a threat to its control over political processes. Historically, regimes with authoritarian capitalist tendencies have preferred to maintain tight control over political structures to ensure stability and prevent challenges to their authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

While Authoritarian Capitalism does not inherently support gerrymandering, it does support the idea of a strong central authority. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission having the power to prevent gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Authoritarian Capitalism tends to favor a strong central authority, which may include control over the redrawing of Congressional districts. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could potentially limit this control, and therefore would likely be opposed by this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Switching to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would likely be seen as a threat to the centralized control favored by authoritarian capitalism. Such a system could dilute the power of the ruling party or regime by making the political landscape more competitive and less predictable, which is contrary to the ideology's goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.