Embracing diverse perspectives and fostering inclusivity within a political party will lead to a stronger, more unified organization capable of achieving common goals.
BT>BT ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Big Tent answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
The Big Tent ideology strongly supports fairness and inclusiveness in the political process. Gerrymandering is a practice that can lead to unfair advantages for the party in power, which goes against the principles of the Big Tent. Therefore, the Big Tent would strongly agree with the idea that an independent, non-partisan commission should be in charge of redistricting to prevent gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Big Tent ideology generally supports inclusiveness and fairness in the political process. An independent, non-partisan commission would help ensure that redistricting is done fairly and without political bias, which aligns with the Big Tent's goals. However, the score is not a 5 because some within the Big Tent may still have concerns about the effectiveness or feasibility of such a commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
The Big Tent ideology may support the idea of a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system as it could promote fairness and inclusiveness in the political process. However, the score is not a 5 because some within the Big Tent may have concerns about the feasibility or effectiveness of such a system, or may prefer other alternatives like an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
The Big Tent ideology generally supports fairness and inclusiveness, which would lead them to disagree with the idea that there is no better alternative to the current redistricting process. However, the score is not a -5 because some within the Big Tent may still have concerns about the effectiveness or feasibility of alternative solutions, such as an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Big Tent ideology is less likely to support the idea of not having an independent, non-partisan commission for redistricting. This is because the lack of such a commission could lead to gerrymandering and unfair advantages for certain political parties, which goes against the inclusive and fair principles of the Big Tent. However, the score is not a -5 because some within the Big Tent may still have concerns about the effectiveness or feasibility of an independent commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
The Big Tent ideology strongly disagrees with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. Gerrymandering is a practice that can lead to unfair advantages for certain political parties and undermine the democratic process, which goes against the principles of fairness and inclusiveness that the Big Tent supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Big Tent issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
