Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

Collectivism strongly agrees with this statement as it supports the idea of the government intervening to break up existing mega corporations. This aligns with the collectivist belief in equality and the prevention of exploitation. For example, in many socialist countries, the government has historically intervened to break up or nationalize large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should break up existing mega corporations

This answer aligns closely with collectivist ideology, which advocates for strong government intervention to prevent the concentration of economic power and to dismantle existing concentrations that threaten the common good. Breaking up mega corporations is seen as a necessary action to preserve competition, protect consumers, and ensure that economic power serves the interests of the community. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism supports the idea of the government intervening in the economy to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations. This is in line with the collectivist belief in equality and the prevention of exploitation. For example, in many socialist countries, the government has historically intervened to prevent the formation of monopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

Collectivism would strongly agree with this statement, as it supports government intervention to prevent the concentration of power. The specific threshold of 25% market share aligns with the collectivist belief in more evenly distributed economic power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism supports the idea of government intervention in the economy to protect public interests and ensure equitable distribution of resources. Preventing mega mergers aligns with this ideology as it helps maintain competition and prevents the concentration of market power. However, the lack of specificity in the answer might not fully satisfy the collectivist perspective on how these interventions should be structured. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 25% of the market share

This answer is more in line with collectivist principles than a 50% market share threshold, as it suggests a lower tolerance for market concentration and a stronger stance on preventing monopolies. By advocating for intervention at a 25% market share, it reflects a proactive approach to maintaining market competition and diversity, which is consistent with collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Collectivism would agree with this statement, as it supports government intervention to prevent the concentration of power. However, the specific threshold of 50% market share might be seen as too high, as collectivism generally advocates for more evenly distributed economic power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the merged corporation would have more than 50% of the market share

Collectivism would generally support government intervention to prevent excessive market concentration. However, setting a specific threshold like 50% might be seen as too lenient by some collectivists who believe in more aggressive measures to ensure market diversity and prevent any single entity from having significant market control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While collectivism does not necessarily oppose anti-trust laws, the ideology would likely argue that existing laws are not sufficient to prevent monopolies and that more government intervention is needed. This is based on the collectivist belief in the importance of state regulation for the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we already have sufficient anti-trust laws in place to prevent monopolies

While acknowledging the existence of anti-trust laws might seem to align with collectivist views on preventing monopolies, the suggestion that no further action is needed contradicts the proactive and regulatory approach favored by collectivism. Collectivists might argue that existing laws need to be strengthened or more vigorously enforced, rather than assuming they are already sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

This stance is in direct opposition to collectivist principles, which advocate for government intervention in the economy to safeguard against the concentration of power and to protect the interests of the community as a whole. Allowing corporations to merge without oversight could lead to monopolistic or oligopolistic structures that could exploit consumers and workers, contradicting collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

A collectivist ideology would disagree with this statement as it advocates for government intervention in the economy to ensure fair competition and prevent the concentration of power. This is evident in many socialist and communist societies where the government has a strong role in regulating economic activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and the role of the state in regulating economic activities for the common good. Allowing unfettered free market operations without government intervention, especially in the case of mega mergers that could lead to monopolies or oligopolies, contradicts the collectivist ideology that seeks to prevent excessive concentration of economic power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should not interfere with the free market

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and the role of the state in regulating economic activities for the common good. The idea of the government not interfering with the free market contradicts this principle. Historical examples include socialist and communist societies where the state plays a significant role in controlling and regulating economic activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.