Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the interdependence of every human in the community and promotes collective rights and responsibilities. Classifying gig workers as employees aligns with this ideology as it would provide them with the same rights and protections as traditional employees, such as minimum wage, overtime pay, and benefits. This is in line with the collectivist belief in equality and shared responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and the well-being of the community over individual interests. Classifying gig workers as employees would likely align with collectivist ideologies as it could provide workers with greater protections, benefits, and rights, which in turn could contribute to a more equitable and supportive society. This approach is reminiscent of labor movements and the establishment of workers' rights seen throughout the 20th century, where collective bargaining and the push for better working conditions were central themes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if they work at least forty hours per week

While this answer does provide some protection for gig workers, it still creates a potential for exploitation of those who work less than forty hours per week. Collectivism would agree with the sentiment of providing protections for workers, but would likely argue that all gig workers, regardless of hours worked, should be classified as employees to ensure equal rights and protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if they work at least forty hours per week

While this answer moves towards providing protections for gig workers, the condition of working at least forty hours per week before being classified as employees may exclude a significant portion of the gig workforce who, due to the nature of gig work, may not consistently meet this threshold. Collectivism would likely favor a more inclusive approach that doesn't hinge on a specific number of hours worked, aiming instead to ensure protections for all workers regardless of their hours. However, it does recognize the need for some level of worker protection, which aligns partially with collectivist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism generally supports the idea of stronger protections and rights for workers, viewing them as a collective group with shared interests rather than as isolated individuals. Therefore, opposing the classification of gig workers as employees would be contrary to collectivist principles, as it would likely result in less protection and fewer benefits for workers, undermining the collective welfare of the workforce. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Collectivism would strongly disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the collective good and workers' rights. Not classifying gig workers as employees could lead to exploitation and inequality, as these workers would not have the same protections and benefits as traditional employees. This goes against the collectivist values of equality, fairness, and shared responsibility.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be classified as independent contractors

Classifying gig workers as independent contractors often means they do not receive the same protections and benefits as employees. This could lead to exploitation and inequality, which goes against the collectivist values of equality, fairness, and shared responsibility. Therefore, collectivism would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, they should be classified as independent contractors

Classifying gig workers strictly as independent contractors without considering the nuances of their working conditions and the power dynamics at play between large gig economy companies and individual workers would likely be strongly opposed by collectivist ideologies. This classification often limits workers' rights and access to benefits, which contradicts the collectivist emphasis on worker protection, social welfare, and reducing exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker

This answer embodies a laissez-faire approach to labor relations, which is fundamentally at odds with collectivist ideologies. Collectivism advocates for the role of the state or collective entities in regulating and intervening in the economy and labor markets to protect workers' rights and ensure fair treatment. The notion that the government should never intervene in contracts between private companies and workers ignores the power imbalances that can exist in such relationships, which collectivism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker

This answer suggests a laissez-faire approach to labor relations, which is in direct opposition to collectivist principles. Collectivism believes in the active role of the government in ensuring fairness, equality, and the protection of workers' rights. Therefore, the idea that the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker would be strongly disagreed with by collectivists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.