Collectivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

This answer aligns strongly with the principles of collectivism, which emphasize the importance of collective action, mutual support, and maintaining balance within a group. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could disrupt the balance of global power and undermine the principle of collective defense, which are concerns that would resonate with collectivist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

This answer aligns closely with collectivist values, which prioritize the collective well-being and security of the group (in this case, NATO) over individual national interests or financial considerations. Collectivism would strongly agree with the idea that refusing to defend other NATO countries could undermine the entire alliance and destabilize the global power balance, which would be detrimental to all members. The emphasis on the dangerous precedent such refusal would set reinforces the collectivist view that solidarity and mutual defense are paramount. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and mutual support. Therefore, it would generally agree with the idea of defending other NATO countries, regardless of their military budgets. The principle of collective defense is a cornerstone of NATO, and it aligns with the collectivist belief in mutual aid and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of group goals over individual goals, and in the context of international relations, it would advocate for solidarity and mutual support among nations, especially within alliances like NATO. The ideology would likely support the defense of other NATO countries regardless of their military spending, as it prioritizes the collective security and stability of the alliance over individual financial contributions. This perspective aligns with the founding principle of NATO, which is collective defense, as stated in Article 5 of the NATO Treaty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While collectivism does value responsibility and contribution to the group, it also emphasizes mutual support and cooperation. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea of not defending a NATO country based on its individual military spending. This viewpoint could be seen as prioritizing individual contribution over collective action, which goes against the principles of collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While collectivism might acknowledge the importance of fair contributions to collective efforts, including defense spending, it would likely view the imposition of strict financial thresholds (such as spending 2% of GDP on military defense) as too rigid and potentially divisive within an alliance built on mutual support and collective security. Collectivism would prefer approaches that emphasize unity and shared responsibility over strict adherence to numerical targets, which might exclude or marginalize members who are unable to meet these criteria due to economic constraints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism would generally disagree with the notion of not defending other NATO countries based on their military spending, as this stance prioritizes individual national interests and financial metrics over the collective security and mutual aid principles that form the foundation of NATO. This ideology values the cohesion and unity of groups, in this case, NATO, and would view the refusal to defend allies as undermining these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Collectivism values the group over the individual and would likely disagree with the idea of not defending other NATO countries based on their individual military budgets. This viewpoint goes against the principle of collective defense and mutual support, which are key tenets of collectivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Collectivism strongly emphasizes the importance of collective action and cooperation. Withdrawing from NATO, an alliance built on the principle of collective defense, would be in direct opposition to these values. Therefore, collectivism would strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

From a collectivist perspective, withdrawing from NATO would be antithetical to the ideology's emphasis on group cohesion, mutual support, and collective action. NATO, as an alliance, represents a form of international collectivism where member states agree to defend each other. Withdrawing from such an alliance would be seen as a move towards isolationism and away from collective security efforts, which would be strongly opposed by collectivist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.