Conservatism

Strongly agree

No

Conservatives typically argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. They believe in personal responsibility and that it is the individual who commits the crime, not the manufacturer or dealer. This stance is supported by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) of 2005, which provides legal protection for firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Conservatives may agree with this statement to some extent, as they believe in holding businesses accountable for their actions when they are negligent. However, they would still emphasize the importance of personal responsibility and argue that manufacturers and dealers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While conservatives do support the right to sue, they would likely disagree with the idea of suing firearms dealers and manufacturers for gun violence, as they believe in personal responsibility and the right to bear arms. They may also argue that such lawsuits could have negative consequences for the firearms industry and the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Conservatives would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe that firearms dealers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. They argue that it is the individual's responsibility to use firearms legally and safely, not the responsibility of the dealer. This stance is supported by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) of 2005, which provides legal protection for firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

American conservatism generally supports the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. They believe that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Holding businesses responsible for the actions of individuals would be seen as an infringement on personal responsibility and the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Conservatives would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe that the primary use of firearms is for self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting, not illegal activity. They also argue that it is the individual's responsibility to use firearms legally and safely, not the responsibility of the manufacturer or dealer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.