Constitutional Monarchism

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Constitutional Monarchism would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of fair and transparent governance. Gerrymandering is a practice that undermines the democratic process by giving an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. An independent, non-partisan commission would help prevent this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Constitutional Monarchism is primarily focused on the role of the monarch and the balance of power between the monarch and the government. While it does not inherently have a strong stance on redistricting, it generally supports fair and transparent governance. An independent, non-partisan commission could be seen as a way to achieve this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

Constitutional Monarchism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports fair and transparent governance. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could be seen as a way to achieve this. However, this answer is not directly related to the core principles of Constitutional Monarchism, so the agreement would not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Constitutional Monarchism would likely disagree with this answer because it supports fair and transparent governance. Allowing redistricting to be controlled by partisan interests could lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power, which goes against the principles of fair governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Constitutional Monarchism would likely disagree with this answer because it supports fair and transparent governance. Suggesting that there is no better alternative to partisan control of redistricting implies that gerrymandering and unfair advantages are acceptable, which goes against the principles of fair governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Constitutional Monarchism would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports fair and transparent governance. Gerrymandering is a practice that undermines the democratic process by giving an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. This answer suggests that gerrymandering is a positive thing, which goes against the principles of fair governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.