Corporate Statism

Strongly agree

More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

Reforming the system to supplement, rather than replace, a working income aligns well with Corporate Statism, as it emphasizes the importance of work and the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. This approach would help maintain a balance between welfare and economic productivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, current benefits should be capped

Capping current benefits aligns with the Corporate Statism ideology, as it seeks to maintain a balance between welfare and the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. This approach would help ensure that welfare does not become a disincentive to work.

Agree

More

Corporate Statism may agree with more restrictions on welfare benefits to some extent, as it emphasizes the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. However, this ideology does not inherently oppose welfare benefits, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, and deny benefits to immigrants

Denying benefits to immigrants may align with some aspects of Corporate Statism, as it seeks to prioritize the needs of the domestic population and the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. However, this stance is not a core tenet of the ideology, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

Corporate Statism may somewhat agree with ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, as it recognizes the need for some social safety nets. However, this ideology is more focused on the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

Corporate Statism may somewhat agree with increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled, as it recognizes the need for some social safety nets. However, this ideology is more focused on the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No changes needed

Corporate Statism does not have a specific stance on the current state of welfare benefits, as its focus is on the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. Therefore, it neither agrees nor disagrees with the idea that no changes are needed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Fewer

Corporate Statism is not inherently against welfare benefits, but it does prioritize the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy. Therefore, it would likely not strongly support fewer restrictions on welfare benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support

Corporate Statism is more focused on the role of corporations and the state in managing the economy, rather than expanding welfare benefits. Therefore, it would likely disagree with the idea that current benefits do not provide enough support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.