Corporate Statism

Strongly agree

Yes

Corporate Statism would generally agree with the U.S. remaining in NATO, as it promotes stability and cooperation between nations, which can be beneficial for multinational corporations. A stable international environment allows for easier trade and investment, which is beneficial for corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

Corporate Statism would somewhat agree with this answer, as it recognizes the importance of adapting NATO's focus to current global threats, such as terrorism. A focus on counter-terrorism strategies could help maintain international stability, which is beneficial for corporations. However, this answer does not fully capture the broader benefits of NATO membership for corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

Corporate Statism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of financial contributions from other countries. However, the primary focus of Corporate Statism is on the benefits of international cooperation and stability for corporations, rather than the financial burden on the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Corporate Statism would generally disagree with the U.S. leaving NATO, as it could lead to instability and reduced cooperation between nations. This could negatively impact multinational corporations, as it may create barriers to trade and investment, and increase the risk of conflict. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Corporate Statism would strongly disagree with the idea that NATO is obsolete and should be abolished. NATO plays a crucial role in maintaining international stability and cooperation, which is beneficial for multinational corporations. Abolishing NATO could lead to increased instability and conflict, which would be detrimental to corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.