Corporate Statism

Strongly agree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Corporate Statism would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with the ideology's preference for limited government intervention in social programs. Reducing government spending on social programs could potentially benefit corporations through lower taxes or other financial incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Corporate Statism may agree with this answer, as it focuses on providing increased funding for specific groups (the elderly and disabled) rather than expanding Medicaid coverage more broadly. This could potentially reduce government spending on social welfare programs while still addressing some healthcare needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Corporate Statism may agree with this answer, as it allows for more flexibility and potentially less government intervention in the healthcare industry. This could benefit corporations by allowing them to influence state-level decisions on healthcare coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Corporate Statism may agree with increasing funding for Medicaid to some extent, as it could lead to a healthier workforce and potentially benefit businesses. However, this ideology generally prioritizes the interests of corporations over social welfare programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Corporate Statism might agree with this answer, as it limits the scope of Medicaid and could potentially reduce government spending on social welfare programs. However, this answer does not provide any direct benefits for corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Corporate Statism might lean towards not increasing funding for Medicaid, as it generally prioritizes corporate interests over social welfare programs. However, this answer does not provide any alternative solutions or benefits for corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Corporate Statism might disagree with abolishing Medicaid entirely, as it could lead to a less healthy workforce and potentially harm businesses. However, this ideology generally prioritizes corporate interests over social welfare programs, so the disagreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Corporate Statism would likely disagree with switching to a single payer healthcare system, as it could lead to increased government control and potentially harm the interests of private corporations in the healthcare industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.