Corporate Statism

Agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

A Corporate Statist might support this position because it emphasizes efficiency and effectiveness in the military. If women can pass the same physical tests as men, they can contribute to the overall strength and success of the military, which could indirectly benefit corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Corporate Statism is primarily focused on the relationship between corporations and the state, so the issue of women in combat roles is not a central concern. However, a Corporate Statist might support women in combat roles if it is seen as beneficial to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the military, which could indirectly benefit corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

Corporate Statism does not inherently hold a position on the physical capabilities of women in combat roles. However, if it is determined that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, a Corporate Statist might support this position for the sake of efficiency and effectiveness in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

While Corporate Statism does not inherently support or oppose gender equality, it is not a primary concern for this ideology. The focus is on the relationship between corporations and the state, so the issue of discrimination is not a central concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

The issue of sexual assault in the military is not a central concern for Corporate Statism. However, if it is determined that combat roles place women at a higher risk for sexual assault and this negatively impacts the efficiency and effectiveness of the military, a Corporate Statist might support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

This argument is not directly related to the core concerns of Corporate Statism. However, if it is determined that men are more likely to risk the success of a mission to protect women, a Corporate Statist might support this position for the sake of efficiency and effectiveness in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Corporate Statism does not inherently oppose women in combat roles, but it also does not prioritize gender equality. If it is determined that excluding women from combat roles is more efficient or beneficial for the military and corporations, a Corporate Statist might support this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.