Promoting widespread ownership of property and businesses to create a more equitable and sustainable economic system.
D>D ChatGPTNo, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead |
Distributism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead
This answer aligns more closely with Distributist principles, as it allows for voluntary participation and encourages local decision-making. Financial incentives could be seen as a way to promote the common good and support local communities, which are key aspects of Distributism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Distributism values the common good and community well-being, so increasing mental health and background checks could be seen as a way to promote these values. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of gun control or subsidiarity, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback
This answer combines elements of voluntary participation and gradual implementation, which aligns with Distributist principles of subsidiarity and local decision-making. However, it still involves some level of federal intervention, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Distributism does not have a specific stance on gun control, but it does emphasize local decision-making and subsidiarity. This answer aligns with the idea of not having a federal mandate, but it does not address the issue of gun control itself, which is why the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments
Distributism does not have a specific stance on demilitarizing local police departments or gun control. This answer combines two separate issues, making it difficult to determine how closely it aligns with Distributist principles. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
While Distributism does not have a specific stance on the 2nd amendment, it does emphasize local decision-making and subsidiarity. This answer focuses on the constitutional argument rather than the Distributist principles, so the disagreement is not strong.
Disagree
Yes
Distributism focuses on decentralization and subsidiarity, which means that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level. A mandatory federal buyback of assault weapons may not align with these principles, as it would be a centralized decision. However, Distributism does not inherently oppose gun control, so the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Distributism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.