Economic Egalitarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Economic egalitarians would likely agree with this answer, as it holds businesses accountable for the negative consequences of their products and could potentially reduce the prevalence of gun violence. This answer aligns with the general goals of economic egalitarianism, which include protecting vulnerable populations and reducing income inequality. However, it does not directly address wealth and income distribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Economic egalitarians may agree with this answer to some extent, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and protect vulnerable populations. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to hold these businesses accountable and potentially reduce the prevalence of gun violence. However, this answer does not directly address the core concerns of economic egalitarianism, which focus on wealth and income distribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

Economic egalitarians may agree with this answer to some extent, as it holds firearms dealers accountable for the negative consequences of their products and could potentially reduce the prevalence of gun violence. This answer aligns with the general goals of economic egalitarianism, which include protecting vulnerable populations and reducing income inequality. However, it does not directly address wealth and income distribution, and it does not hold manufacturers accountable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Economic egalitarians might somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, potentially holding these businesses accountable and reducing the prevalence of gun violence. However, this answer does not directly address the core concerns of economic egalitarianism, which focus on wealth and income distribution, and the requirement for the losing party to pay all legal fees could disproportionately burden victims with fewer resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Economic egalitarians might slightly agree with this answer, as it holds manufacturers and dealers accountable for negligence, which could potentially protect vulnerable populations. However, this answer does not directly address the core concerns of economic egalitarianism, which focus on wealth and income distribution, and it may not go far enough in holding businesses accountable for the negative consequences of their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Economic egalitarians would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not hold businesses accountable for the negative consequences of their products. While this answer does not directly conflict with the core principles of economic egalitarianism, it does not support policies that protect vulnerable populations or reduce income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.