Economic Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Economic egalitarians would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. This approach could lead to increased economic inequality and reduced competition, which are both concerns for economic egalitarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Economic egalitarians would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the principle of treating all internet traffic equally, regardless of the source. This approach aligns with the goals of economic egalitarianism, which seeks to reduce economic disparities and promote equal opportunities for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Economic egalitarians would likely agree with this answer because it supports equal treatment of all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This approach aligns with the principles of economic egalitarianism, which seeks to reduce economic disparities and promote equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Economic egalitarians might slightly disagree with this answer because, while it does not prioritize specific websites, it still introduces a level of inequality by prioritizing certain types of content. This could potentially disadvantage some websites or users, which goes against the principles of economic egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Economic egalitarians would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for inequality between websites based on their ability to pay for higher quality access. This approach could disadvantage smaller websites and startups, which goes against the principles of economic egalitarianism that seek to reduce economic disparities and promote equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Economic egalitarians would likely disagree with this answer because, while it may make the internet faster and more reliable for some users, it could also lead to greater inequality between websites and limit access to less popular or financially disadvantaged websites. This goes against the principles of economic egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Economic egalitarians would likely disagree with this answer because it promotes inequality between websites and could lead to a less open and accessible internet. This approach could disadvantage smaller websites and startups, which goes against the principles of economic egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.