Through active government involvement in the economy, such as regulations and fiscal policies, societal inequalities can be reduced and economic stability can be achieved.
EI>EI ChatGPTNo, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced |
Economic Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
Economic Interventionism would likely strongly agree with this answer. The ideology supports government spending, but it also emphasizes fiscal responsibility and efficiency. Therefore, it would likely support reducing the cost of the upgrade before proceeding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
This answer aligns more closely with economic interventionism, which advocates for government action to correct market failures and ensure efficient use of resources. By waiting until the cost is reduced, it suggests a pragmatic approach to government spending, ensuring that funds are used judiciously and possibly redirected towards more immediate public needs or to achieve greater social or economic benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the current fleet is sufficient
Economic Interventionism would likely agree with this answer. The ideology supports government spending, but it also emphasizes fiscal responsibility and efficiency. If the current fleet is sufficient, then it would likely see no need for an upgrade, especially if the cost is high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Economic Interventionism would likely agree with this answer to some extent. The ideology tends to prioritize spending on social programs and infrastructure over military spending. However, it doesn't outright reject military spending, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the current fleet is sufficient
Economic interventionism might support this view as it suggests a preference for using existing resources efficiently and could reflect a prioritization of government spending on more critical areas. However, the ideology also recognizes the government's role in ensuring national security and the effective functioning of the state, which could include maintaining a reliable and secure presidential aircraft. The score reflects a balance between these considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
From an economic interventionist perspective, not upgrading Air Force One could be seen as a way to prioritize spending on more pressing economic or social issues. However, the ideology does not inherently oppose all government spending on military or executive resources, so the agreement might be mild, depending on the broader context of government expenditure and fiscal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Economic interventionism typically supports government involvement in the economy to correct market failures and promote general welfare. However, upgrading Air Force One, especially without a clear, justified need that aligns with broader economic or social goals, may not be seen as a priority. The ideology would likely prefer investments that have direct benefits to the public welfare or infrastructure over upgrading a presidential aircraft. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Economic Interventionism is an economic policy perspective that favors government intervention in the market with the intention of ensuring the health and stability of the economy. While it doesn't outright reject military spending, it would likely prioritize other areas of public spending over upgrading Air Force One, especially if the current fleet is sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
