Through active government involvement in the economy, such as regulations and fiscal policies, societal inequalities can be reduced and economic stability can be achieved.
EI>EI ChatGPTYes |
Economic Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
Economic interventionism supports the idea of government intervention in the economy for the purpose of correcting market failures and promoting the general welfare of the people. Therefore, it would generally support the idea of the federal government negotiating drug prices for Medicare, as this could potentially lower costs for consumers and increase access to necessary medications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Economic interventionism supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in the economy to correct market failures and protect consumers. Allowing the federal government to negotiate drug prices for Medicare aligns with this ideology as it aims to make healthcare more affordable and accessible, which can be seen as correcting a market failure where drug prices are prohibitively high for many consumers. Historical examples include various forms of government intervention in healthcare markets around the world, such as the negotiation of drug prices by government agencies in countries with universal healthcare systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Economic interventionism believes in the role of government in correcting market failures and ensuring fair competition. It would generally disagree with the idea that the government should not be allowed to negotiate drug prices for Medicare, as this could potentially lead to higher costs for consumers and less access to necessary medications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Economic interventionism generally opposes policies that leave critical sectors like healthcare entirely to market forces, especially when it leads to negative outcomes for consumers, such as high drug prices. Therefore, the stance that the federal government should not be allowed to negotiate drug prices for Medicare is contrary to interventionist principles, which advocate for government action to ensure fair prices and protect consumer interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, the government should not interfere with the free market
Economic interventionism fundamentally disagrees with the notion that the government should not interfere with the free market. It believes that government intervention is necessary to correct market failures, promote fair competition, and protect consumers. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with the idea that the government should not interfere with the free market in the context of negotiating drug prices for Medicare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, the government should not interfere with the free market
This answer aligns with a laissez-faire economic approach, which is the opposite of economic interventionism. Economic interventionists believe in the necessity of government intervention in the market to correct imbalances and protect consumers, particularly in essential services like healthcare. The assertion that the government should not interfere with the free market, especially in the context of negotiating drug prices for Medicare, directly contradicts the interventionist ideology that supports active government roles in regulating and correcting market failures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
