Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with egalitarian principles, as it not only limits the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor but also bans all political donations and calls for publicly funded elections. This would help ensure that all candidates have equal access to resources and reduce the influence of money in politics, promoting a more equal and democratic system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Egalitarians would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it helps level the playing field and prevent wealthy donors from having an outsized influence on elections. However, this answer does not go as far as some egalitarians might prefer, such as banning all political donations or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Egalitarians would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. However, this answer does not provide specific solutions or proposals for how to achieve this goal, such as limiting donation amounts or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency in political donations is important, this answer does not address the core issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence on elections. Egalitarians would likely prefer solutions that limit or eliminate private donations altogether, rather than simply making them public knowledge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Egalitarians would generally disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations can lead to a disproportionate influence of wealthy donors on elections and undermine the principle of equal representation. This goes against the core values of egalitarianism, which seeks to promote equal opportunities and reduce disparities in power and influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Egalitarians would strongly disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue as a matter of free speech rather than addressing the potential for unequal influence and corruption in the political system. Egalitarians would argue that limiting or eliminating private donations is necessary to promote a more equal and democratic system, and that this does not infringe on free speech rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.