Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

This answer aligns with egalitarianism's core principle of equal treatment for all individuals, regardless of their religion. It also acknowledges the importance of upholding constitutional rights, which is a key aspect of promoting equality and fairness in society.

Strongly agree

No

Egalitarianism supports equal treatment of all individuals, so not banning Muslim immigrants aligns with this ideology. However, the concern for security and proper screening processes is not addressed in this answer, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

This answer attempts to balance security concerns with equal treatment by focusing on 'high risk' countries rather than a specific religious group. However, it still involves discrimination based on nationality, which is not in line with the principles of egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While this answer addresses security concerns by calling for improved screening processes, it goes against egalitarianism by proposing a blanket ban on all immigration. This would disproportionately affect vulnerable groups and individuals seeking better opportunities, which is not in line with the principles of equal treatment and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While this answer acknowledges the need for improved security measures, it still discriminates against Muslim immigrants by singling them out for a ban. Egalitarianism seeks to treat all individuals equally, so this answer goes against its core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Egalitarianism promotes equal rights and opportunities for all individuals, regardless of their background. Banning Muslim immigrants goes against this principle, as it discriminates against a specific religious group. However, the concern for security is acknowledged, which is why the score is not -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.