Electoral Reform

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Many electoral reform advocates strongly support public funding of elections and banning private donations. This approach is seen as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics, promote equal opportunities for candidates, and minimize corruption. Countries like Germany and Sweden have implemented public funding systems for political parties and candidates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Electoral reform advocates generally support limits on campaign donations to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more level playing field for candidates. For example, the UK has donation limits for political parties and candidates during election periods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Electoral reform supporters generally agree that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as this can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates. Limiting donations can help reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more democratic system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency is important to electoral reform advocates, simply making donations public knowledge does not address the core issue of money's influence on politics. However, some may see this as a step in the right direction, as it allows voters to make informed decisions about candidates based on their funding sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

While some may argue that limiting donations is a violation of free speech, electoral reform advocates typically prioritize reducing the influence of money in politics and promoting a more democratic system. They believe that unlimited donations can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates, which ultimately undermines the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Electoral reform supporters typically oppose unlimited donations, as they believe this can lead to corruption and an uneven playing field for candidates. Unlimited donations can allow wealthy individuals and corporations to have disproportionate influence on elections and policy decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.