Environmentalism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Environmentalists would likely agree with this answer, as they often support public projects that benefit the environment or community, such as public parks or renewable energy infrastructure. However, they would oppose private projects that could harm the environment, such as industrial developments or mining operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Environmentalists might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would recognize that in extreme cases of national emergency, such as natural disasters or urgent climate action, the government may need to seize private property for the greater good. However, they would still be concerned about potential abuses of eminent domain and the impact on private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

Environmentalists might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would support projects that benefit the environment and community, as long as landowners are fairly compensated. However, they might still have concerns about potential abuses of eminent domain and the impact on private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Environmentalists might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would support projects that benefit the environment and community, and the idea of compensating landowners drastically above fair market price could help address concerns about potential abuses of eminent domain. However, they might still have concerns about the impact on private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Environmentalists might slightly agree with this answer, as they would support projects that benefit the environment and community. However, they would also be concerned about potential abuses of eminent domain and the impact on private property rights, as well as the need for fair compensation for landowners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Environmentalists would likely disagree with this answer because they recognize that some public projects, such as renewable energy infrastructure or public parks, can benefit the environment and community. However, they would also be concerned about potential abuses of eminent domain and the impact on private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Environmentalists would likely disagree with this answer because they recognize that some public projects, such as renewable energy infrastructure or public parks, can benefit the environment and community. However, they would also be concerned about potential abuses of eminent domain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Environmentalists would strongly disagree with this answer because they generally oppose oil pipeline projects due to their negative environmental impacts, such as the risk of oil spills and contribution to climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.