Environmentalism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Environmentalists would strongly agree with stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline due to concerns about potential water contamination, destruction of sacred Native American sites, and the pipeline's contribution to climate change by promoting the use of fossil fuels. For example, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and environmental activists protested against the pipeline in 2016, leading to a temporary halt in construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Environmentalists would generally agree with stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline and opposing the use of eminent domain to acquire land for such projects. Eminent domain has been used in the past to force landowners to sell their property for pipeline construction, which can lead to environmental degradation and the loss of valuable ecosystems. However, this answer might not fully capture the broader environmental concerns related to the pipeline, such as its contribution to climate change and potential risks to water sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land would address some concerns about cultural and historical preservation, environmentalists would still be concerned about the pipeline's overall impact on the environment and contribution to climate change. This answer might be seen as a compromise, but it does not fully align with the environmentalist ideology of reducing dependence on fossil fuels and protecting the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents might provide some incentive for the company to improve safety measures, but it does not address the fundamental concerns of environmentalists regarding the pipeline's impact on the environment and climate change. This answer might be seen as a small step in the right direction, but it falls short of the more comprehensive changes that environmentalists would prefer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Environmentalists would strongly disagree with allowing the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline to continue without any changes. They argue that the pipeline poses significant risks to the environment, including potential oil spills, damage to ecosystems, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. The opposition to the pipeline by environmental groups and Native American tribes demonstrates their strong disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.