Environmentalism

Very strongly agree

No

Environmentalists would strongly agree with avoiding war, as it would prevent the environmental destruction associated with military conflict. Instead, they would advocate for peaceful resolutions and diplomacy to address international issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns with the environmentalist's preference for peaceful resolutions and diplomacy. This approach avoids the environmental destruction associated with war and promotes international cooperation, which is essential for addressing global environmental issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Environmentalists would be concerned about the potential environmental consequences of nuclear weapons, but they would still prefer non-violent solutions to address the issue. Going to war only if Iran develops nuclear weapons is a conditional agreement to war, which still goes against the environmentalist's preference for peaceful resolutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While missile strikes may be less invasive than a full-scale war, they still have negative environmental consequences, such as pollution from missile debris and potential harm to ecosystems. Environmentalists would likely disagree with this option, as it still involves violence and environmental damage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Environmentalism prioritizes the protection of the environment and natural resources. War has significant negative impacts on the environment, such as pollution, deforestation, and destruction of ecosystems. Therefore, environmentalists would strongly disagree with going to war with Iran, as it would cause environmental damage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.