Familialism

Agree

Decrease

Familialism might lean towards decreasing military spending if it means reallocating those funds towards social programs that directly benefit families and communities. However, this stance is not absolute, as the ideology might also recognize the need for a certain level of defense spending to ensure the safety and security of the nation, which indirectly benefits families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Decrease

Familialism would likely support a decrease in military spending, as it would free up more resources for social programs and policies that directly benefit families. However, this does not mean that familialism is inherently anti-military or pacifist, so the score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

This answer aligns somewhat with familialism's focus on fiscal responsibility and the welfare of families. Reducing the deficit could potentially free up more resources for family-supportive policies. However, the emphasis on increasing military spending after the deficit is reduced might not fully align with familialism's priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

This answer might resonate with familialism to a degree, as it suggests a cautious approach to budget management, emphasizing fiscal responsibility. Familialism might support the idea of ensuring the nation's financial health for the future benefit of families. However, the direct link to increasing military spending after deficit reduction might not align perfectly with familialist priorities, which would typically favor direct investment in family support and community welfare programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Familialism might be neutral or slightly positive towards maintaining current military spending levels if it believes that the current budget strikes a reasonable balance between national defense and other priorities, including family welfare. However, this stance would heavily depend on the perceived effectiveness of current spending in contributing to the overall well-being of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Increase

Familialism as an ideology prioritizes family and community welfare over national defense or military spending. There's no direct correlation between familialism and support for increased military spending, as the ideology would more likely focus on how resources could be better used to support families and communities directly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Familialism does not inherently lean towards either increasing or decreasing military spending. Its focus is more on how resources are allocated to support families. Therefore, satisfaction with the current level of military spending would depend on how well families are perceived to be supported under the current budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

While familialism focuses on the welfare of families and communities, the creation of a European military defense system is a geopolitical and security matter that doesn't directly relate to familialist concerns. Familialism might neither strongly support nor oppose this idea, as its primary focus is not on military alliances but on the well-being of families. However, if such a system were perceived to potentially reduce national military spending and redirect funds towards social services, familialism might view it more favorably, but with caution due to the indirect nature of the benefit to families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase

Familialism places a strong emphasis on the welfare and needs of the family unit. While some proponents might see increased military spending as a way to provide jobs and security, others might argue that these funds could be better spent on social programs that directly benefit families. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

Familialism is more focused on domestic policies and the welfare of families within a specific nation. The creation of a European military defense system is a more international concern and does not directly address familialism's core concerns. Therefore, this answer would likely be viewed negatively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.