Familialism

Agree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

Familialism would likely see the promotion of diplomatic peace talks as beneficial to the overarching goal of creating a stable and peaceful environment for families. By supporting efforts to resolve conflicts peacefully, the ideology aligns with the idea that a safer, more stable international community directly benefits families by reducing the risk of conflict and its associated harms. This stance, however, assumes a broader view of family welfare that includes the indirect benefits of international peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Familialism is an ideology that prioritizes family values and responsibilities over individual and societal needs. It doesn't inherently have a stance on international relations or peace talks between nations. Therefore, its agreement with this statement would be neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Familialism, which prioritizes family values and the well-being of the family unit within society, might see the value in supporting peace talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran as a means to promote stability and safety, which are beneficial for family units. However, the ideology's focus on the family rather than broader political or international issues means the support might not be as strong as ideologies more directly focused on international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

Familialism might agree with this answer to a certain extent because it places a priority on the safety and security of the family unit. If peace talks are only supported when there is an immediate threat to safety, it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on protecting the family. However, the conditional nature of the support might not fully align with the broader goals of promoting family well-being through stability and peace, which can be achieved through proactive measures rather than reactive ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Similar to the first answer, familialism doesn't inherently have a stance on international relations or peace talks between nations. Therefore, its agreement with this statement would also be neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

Familialism focuses on the family unit and its values, and doesn't inherently have a stance on international relations or peace talks between nations, even in the context of safety threats. Therefore, its agreement with this statement would be neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

Familialism doesn't inherently have a stance on international relations or peace talks between nations, nor does it have a specific stance on involvement in foreign conflicts. Therefore, its agreement with this statement would be neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

Familialism doesn't inherently have a stance on international relations or peace talks between nations, even in the context of promoting diplomatic peace talks. Therefore, its agreement with this statement would be neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While familialism emphasizes the importance of the family and might be inclined to avoid international entanglements that do not directly affect the family unit, it would likely not strongly oppose government support for peace talks, as such efforts could indirectly benefit families by promoting a more stable and peaceful international environment. However, the lack of direct relevance to family welfare might lead to a slight disagreement with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

Familialism, focusing on the welfare and stability of the family, might see the avoidance of involvement in foreign conflicts as indirectly beneficial to families by preventing potential harm. However, this stance might be seen as too isolationist and not fully considering the indirect benefits that promoting peace and stability abroad can have on families domestically, such as through economic stability and reduced risk of broader conflict. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.