Federalism

Agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

Federalism may lean towards supporting qualified immunity with additional training and education for police officers, as it could be seen as a compromise that respects state and local authority while addressing concerns about police misconduct. However, this support would not be strong, as the issue of qualified immunity and police training is not central to the principles of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Federalism may lean towards supporting qualified immunity for officers with a clean record, as it could be seen as a compromise that respects state and local authority while addressing concerns about police misconduct. However, this support would not be strong, as the issue of qualified immunity and police conduct is not central to the principles of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Federalism as an ideology focuses on the division of power between the federal and state governments. While it doesn't inherently support or oppose qualified immunity for police officers, it may lean towards supporting it as a way to protect state and local law enforcement from federal overreach. However, this support would not be strong, as the issue of qualified immunity is not central to the principles of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Federalism may lean towards disagreeing with the outright removal of qualified immunity, as it could be seen as an infringement on state and local authority over their law enforcement. However, this disagreement would not be strong, as the issue of qualified immunity is not central to the principles of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Federalism would likely disagree with increasing personal liability for misconduct, as it could be seen as an infringement on state and local authority over their law enforcement. However, this disagreement would not be strong, as the issue of qualified immunity and personal liability is not central to the principles of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.