Federalism

Agree

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

Federalists may be more inclined to support this answer, as it allows for drilling while also acknowledging the need for environmental regulations. This could be seen as a compromise between state and federal interests, with the state of Alaska benefiting from the drilling and the federal government ensuring environmental protection. However, the score is not higher because federalism itself does not inherently support or oppose drilling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Similar to Answer 1, federalism does not inherently support or oppose drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. Federalists may argue that the decision should be left to the state of Alaska, rather than the federal government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Federalism as an ideology is focused on the division of power between the federal government and state governments. It does not inherently lean towards supporting or opposing drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. However, federalists may argue that the decision should be left to the state of Alaska, rather than the federal government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves

Federalism does not inherently support or oppose drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge, but this answer implies that the federal government should have a say in when drilling is allowed. Federalists may argue that the decision should be left to the state of Alaska, rather than the federal government, making this answer less appealing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

This answer opposes drilling and advocates for increased federal involvement in alternative energy subsidies. Federalists may be less inclined to support this answer, as it implies a larger role for the federal government in energy policy. However, the score is not lower because federalism itself does not inherently support or oppose drilling or alternative energy subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.