Federalism

Slightly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

While federalism does not inherently have a stance on international defense agreements, some federalists might argue that maintaining international alliances is important for the stability of the nation and its states. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could set a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power, which could negatively impact the U.S. and its states. Therefore, some federalists might agree with this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, federalism does not inherently have a stance on international defense agreements. Some federalists might argue that the U.S. should prioritize its own defense and resources over other countries, especially those with low military defense budgets. However, this is not a core tenet of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Federalism as an ideology focuses on the division of power between a central government and smaller political units, such as states. It does not inherently have a stance on international defense agreements like NATO. However, some federalists might argue that maintaining international alliances is important for the stability of the nation and its states. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Again, federalism does not inherently have a stance on international defense agreements. Some federalists might argue that the U.S. should prioritize its own defense and resources over other countries, especially those with low military defense budgets. However, this is not a core tenet of federalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

While federalism does not inherently have a stance on international defense agreements, withdrawing from NATO would likely be seen as a destabilizing move that could weaken the U.S. and its states. Federalists might argue that maintaining international alliances is important for the stability of the nation and its states, so they would likely disagree with this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.