Feminism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Feminism would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This practice could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would disproportionately affect marginalized groups and go against the principles of equality and fairness that feminism promotes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Feminism would strongly agree with the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with the principles of net neutrality, which many feminists have supported in the past, as it ensures equal access to information and resources online and promotes a more equal and fair internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Feminism would likely support the idea of not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as this would promote a more equal and fair internet. This stance aligns with the principles of net neutrality, which many feminists have supported in the past, as it ensures equal access to information and resources online. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing internet traffic by type rather than source may seem like a more fair approach, feminism would likely still be concerned with the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain types of content over others. This could still lead to an unequal playing field and limit access to important resources and information for marginalized groups, which goes against the principles of feminism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model may still result in an unequal playing field, as it would likely favor wealthier individuals and organizations who can afford to pay for higher quality access. This could limit access to important resources and information for marginalized groups, which goes against the principles of feminism. While there may not be specific historical examples related to this issue, the general stance of feminism would likely be against such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Feminism as an ideology is generally concerned with equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of feminism. While there may not be specific historical examples related to this issue, the general stance of feminism would likely be against such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While making the internet faster and more reliable for users may seem like a positive outcome, feminism would likely be concerned with the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to an unequal playing field and limit access to important resources and information for marginalized groups, which goes against the principles of feminism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.