Fiscal Conservatism

Strongly agree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Fiscal conservatives generally advocate for limited government intervention and strong property rights. They would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their belief in minimal government involvement in private property matters. However, some may recognize the need for eminent domain in certain situations, so the agreement may not be unanimous. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Fiscal conservatives generally support limited government intervention and strong property rights. They would likely agree with this answer, as it opposes the government seizing private property. However, some may recognize the need for eminent domain in certain situations, so the agreement may not be unanimous. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Fiscal conservatives may agree with this answer to some extent, as it limits the government's ability to seize private property to extreme cases of national emergency. This aligns with their preference for limited government intervention, while still recognizing the potential need for eminent domain in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Fiscal conservatives may agree with this answer to some extent, as it limits the government's ability to seize private property to public projects only. However, they would still prefer minimal government intervention in property rights, so their agreement would not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

While fiscal conservatives prioritize property rights and limited government intervention, some may see the value in allowing the government to seize private property for public or civic use if landowners are fairly compensated and the projects benefit the community. However, this agreement would likely be weak, as it still involves government intervention in property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Fiscal conservatives may have mixed opinions on this answer. While they generally oppose government intervention in property rights, some may see the value in allowing eminent domain if landowners are compensated significantly above fair market price. However, others may still view this as an infringement on property rights and prefer no government involvement at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize limited government intervention and property rights. While they may support oil pipeline projects for economic reasons, they would not likely agree with the government seizing private property only for this specific purpose, as it goes against their broader principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Fiscal conservatives prioritize limited government intervention and property rights. They would likely disagree with this answer, as it allows the government to seize private property without any restrictions or conditions, which goes against their core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.