Fiscal Conservatism

Strongly agree

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

Fiscal conservatives may support drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge with strict environmental regulations, as it balances the need for economic growth and domestic energy production with concerns about environmental impact. This approach could also help mitigate potential long-term costs associated with environmental damage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Fiscal conservatives generally prioritize economic growth and limited government intervention. Drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge could lead to job creation and increased domestic oil production, which fiscal conservatives may support. However, some fiscal conservatives may also be concerned about the potential environmental impact and long-term sustainability of such drilling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

While fiscal conservatives may not be opposed to alternative energy sources, they are generally against increasing government subsidies, as they believe in limited government intervention in the economy. Therefore, they may not fully support this answer, which calls for increased alternative energy subsidies to eliminate dependence on fossil fuels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves

Fiscal conservatives may not fully agree with waiting until all other oil reserves are depleted before drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge, as this approach could limit domestic energy production and economic growth. However, some fiscal conservatives may appreciate the focus on utilizing existing resources before tapping into protected areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Fiscal conservatives are less likely to support a complete ban on drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge, as it could hinder economic growth and limit domestic energy resources. However, some fiscal conservatives may be open to considering alternative energy sources or more sustainable drilling practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.