Responsible government spending and balanced budgets lead to a stable economy and reduced debt for future generations.
FC>FC ChatGPTNo, this would be too costly and ineffective |
Fiscal Conservatism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this would be too costly and ineffective
This answer aligns with fiscal conservatism's focus on cost-effectiveness and skepticism of large government projects. Fiscal conservatives would likely agree that a wall would be too costly and potentially ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, keep the current wall but do not build more of it
This answer aligns with fiscal conservatism's focus on cost-effectiveness and skepticism of large government projects. Maintaining the current wall without expanding it could be seen as a more financially responsible approach to border security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one
Fiscal conservatives may be more open to this idea, as it could be seen as a more cost-effective and technologically advanced solution to border security. However, they would still likely scrutinize the costs and benefits of such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase our military presence along the southern border
Fiscal conservatives might see increasing military presence as a more cost-effective solution to border security than building a wall. However, they would still likely be concerned about the costs associated with maintaining a larger military presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Fiscal conservatives may agree with the idea of a wall for security reasons, but they are also concerned about government spending and cost-effectiveness. Building a wall could be seen as an expensive and potentially ineffective solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
While fiscal conservatives might appreciate the idea of another country paying for the wall, they may still question the cost-effectiveness and practicality of the project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Fiscal conservatives might not be completely against the idea of a wall, but they would likely prefer more cost-effective solutions to border security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should adopt an open border policy
An open border policy goes against the principles of fiscal conservatism, which generally supports controlled immigration and border security. Fiscal conservatives would likely strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Fiscal Conservatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
