Green Politics

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Green Politics supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Imposing term limits on judges would help achieve these goals by preventing lifetime appointments and ensuring a more regular turnover of judges. This would likely be more agreeable to Green Politics than expanding the number of seats, as it directly addresses the issue of entrenched power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Green Politics generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. While not a core issue for the movement, many Green Party members might support both term limits and more seats to increase diversity and reduce the influence of any single judge. However, this is not a primary focus of Green Politics, so the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Green Politics might support increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court as a way to increase diversity and reduce the influence of any single judge. However, this reform alone does not address the issue of lifetime appointments, which is a more significant concern for those seeking to reduce the influence of special interests. Therefore, the score is positive but not as high as for answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Green Politics would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, this answer implies maintaining the status quo, which may not align with the movement's goals of promoting democracy and reducing the influence of special interests. Therefore, Green Politics might slightly disagree with this answer, but not as strongly as with other answers that directly oppose reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Green Politics is generally in favor of reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Keeping the Supreme Court as it is would not align with these goals, so Green Politics would likely disagree with this answer. However, since this is not a core issue for the movement, the score is not at the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Green Politics generally supports reforms that promote democracy and reduce the influence of special interests. Arguing that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power goes against the goals of Green Politics. While not a core issue for the movement, this answer is likely to be strongly disagreed with by Green Politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.