Green Politics

Very strongly agree

Yes

Green Politics strongly supports environmental protection and social justice. Stopping the Dakota Access pipeline aligns with these values, as it would prevent potential environmental damage and respect the rights of Native American communities. Historically, Green parties and activists have opposed similar projects, such as the Keystone XL pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Green Politics supports the protection of both the environment and individual property rights. Stopping the Dakota Access pipeline and preventing the government from acquiring land through eminent domain aligns with these values. However, this answer may not fully address the broader environmental concerns that Green Politics seeks to address, such as transitioning to renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land addresses the social justice aspect, it does not fully align with Green Politics' environmental goals. Green Politics would prefer to stop the pipeline altogether, but rerouting it is a better option than allowing it to continue on its current path. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents may provide some incentive for the company to be more cautious, but it does not address the core concerns of Green Politics. The construction of the pipeline still poses environmental risks and infringes on indigenous rights. This answer is not ideal for Green Politics, but it is slightly better than allowing the pipeline to continue without any additional consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Green Politics opposes the construction of pipelines that pose environmental risks and infringe on the rights of indigenous communities. The Dakota Access pipeline has been criticized for both of these reasons, so Green Politics would strongly disagree with allowing its construction to continue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.