Human Rights

Very strongly agree

Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training

Human rights ideology would strongly agree with this answer because it addresses the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals by implementing strict background checks, psychological testing, and training for gun purchasers. This approach balances the right to self-defense with the need for public safety and reducing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Human rights ideology generally supports measures that protect the right to life and security of individuals. More restrictions on purchasing guns could help reduce gun violence and protect human rights. However, the score is not a 5 because the human rights perspective also acknowledges the right to self-defense and the need for a balance between individual rights and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only by closing the gun show loophole

Human rights ideology would likely agree with this answer because it addresses the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals by closing the gun show loophole, which allows some individuals to purchase guns without background checks. This measure could help reduce gun violence and protect human rights while still acknowledging the right to self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for criminals and the mentally ill

Human rights ideology would likely agree with this answer because it addresses the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals by restricting access to guns for criminals and the mentally ill. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not address other potential measures to reduce gun violence and protect human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but increase penalties for gun-related crimes

Human rights ideology might agree with this answer because it addresses the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals by increasing penalties for gun-related crimes. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not address other potential measures to reduce gun violence and protect human rights, such as restrictions on gun purchases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for assault weapons

Human rights ideology might slightly agree with this answer because it addresses the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals by restricting access to assault weapons. However, the score is not higher because this answer does not address other potential measures to reduce gun violence and protect human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and ban all guns from public use

Human rights ideology might slightly disagree with this answer because it proposes an outright ban on all guns for public use, which could infringe on the right to self-defense. However, the score is not lower because the human rights perspective also acknowledges the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals, and this answer aims to address that concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Human rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it does not address the need to protect the right to life and security of individuals. However, the score is not a -5 because the human rights perspective also acknowledges the right to self-defense and the need for a balance between individual rights and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should pass a national “stand your ground” law

Human rights ideology would likely disagree with this answer because it not only opposes restrictions on gun purchases but also advocates for a national 'stand your ground' law, which could potentially lead to more gun violence and threaten the right to life and security of individuals. The score is not a -5 because the human rights perspective acknowledges the right to self-defense, but this answer leans too heavily on that aspect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.