Try the political quiz

Human Rights policy on sanctuary cities

Topics

Should sanctuary cities receive federal funding?

HR>HR  ChatGPTYes

Human Rights answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

The Human Rights ideology generally supports the protection of vulnerable populations, such as undocumented immigrants. Sanctuary cities provide a safe haven for these individuals by limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. By supporting federal funding for sanctuary cities, the Human Rights ideology would be promoting the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. However, the score is not a full 5 because there may be some debate within the Human Rights community about the best way to address immigration issues and the role of sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Human Rights ideology would generally disagree with withholding federal funding from sanctuary cities, as this could undermine the protection of human rights for undocumented immigrants. Cutting off funding could lead to increased cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, resulting in more deportations and family separations. However, the score is not a full -5 because there may be some debate within the Human Rights community about the best way to address immigration issues and the role of sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

The Human Rights ideology would strongly disagree with banning sanctuary cities, as this would directly undermine the protection of human rights for undocumented immigrants. Banning sanctuary cities would force local governments to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, leading to increased deportations, family separations, and potentially violating the rights of individuals seeking asylum. This position is in direct opposition to the core principles of the Human Rights ideology, which seeks to protect the rights of all individuals, regardless of their immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Human Rights issues? Take the political quiz to find out.