Fostering global cooperation and collaboration can lead to a more peaceful, equitable, and prosperous world for all.
I>I ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Internationalism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
This answer aligns with the internationalist values of fairness and cooperation. Gerrymandering undermines the democratic process by giving an unfair advantage to the party in power. Internationalism would support the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission to prevent such manipulation and promote a more democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Internationalism generally supports cooperation and fairness among nations, which can be extended to the idea of fair representation within a nation. An independent, non-partisan commission would help ensure that districts are drawn fairly and without political bias, promoting a more democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Internationalism would likely support this answer, as it promotes a more democratic and fair redistricting process. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would help ensure that all voices are represented and reduce the potential for gerrymandering and political manipulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Internationalism would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies that there is no better alternative to the current system, which can be prone to gerrymandering and political manipulation. Internationalism would likely support exploring alternative methods to ensure a fair and democratic redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Internationalism would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against the principles of fairness and cooperation. Allowing political parties to control the redistricting process can lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power, which is not in line with internationalist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
This answer goes against the internationalist values of fairness and cooperation. Gerrymandering is a manipulative practice that undermines the democratic process and gives an unfair advantage to the party in power. Internationalism would not support the idea of gerrymandering as a means to more effectively represent the interests of a constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Internationalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.