Liberation Theology

Very strongly agree

No

Liberation Theology would strongly agree with the idea that the government should not hire private companies to run prisons. This ideology seeks to address social injustices and prioritize the needs of the poor and marginalized. Private prisons have been criticized for prioritizing profit over the well-being of inmates, which is in direct opposition to the goals of Liberation Theology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

Liberation Theology would strongly agree with this statement, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of private prisons. This ideology emphasizes social justice and the preferential option for the poor, and private prisons have been criticized for sacrificing quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit. This directly contradicts the goals of Liberation Theology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas

Eliminating contractual occupancy quotas is a step in the right direction, but Liberation Theology would still likely disagree with private companies running prisons. The focus on social justice and the preferential option for the poor means that any profit-driven system, even without occupancy quotas, could still lead to the exploitation and mistreatment of inmates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption

While strict regulation might mitigate some of the negative aspects of private prisons, Liberation Theology would still lean towards disagreeing with this option. The core principles of this ideology prioritize social justice and the well-being of the poor and marginalized, which can be compromised in a profit-driven prison system, even with regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Liberation Theology strongly disagrees with the idea of private companies running prisons. This ideology emphasizes social justice, equality, and the preferential option for the poor. Private prisons are often seen as profit-driven institutions that exploit the incarcerated population, which goes against the principles of Liberation Theology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.