A society where individuals enjoy both personal freedom and collective ownership, aiming for a more equitable distribution of resources and power.
LS>LS ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Libertarian Socialism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Libertarian socialism agrees with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment. This practice could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which go against the principles of libertarian socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Libertarian socialism supports equal access to information and resources, regardless of financial status. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns with the principles of libertarian socialism, which supports treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. By not allowing ISPs to prioritize access based on payment, the internet remains a more open and equal platform for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer suggests prioritizing traffic by type rather than source, it still allows for the possibility of unequal access to information. Libertarian socialism would prefer a solution that ensures equal access for all users, regardless of the type of content being accessed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model still allows for prioritization based on payment, which goes against the principles of libertarian socialism. This approach would create a tiered system that benefits wealthier entities and hinders equal access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Libertarian socialism opposes the idea of prioritizing access based on payment, as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites that pay higher rates would create an unequal playing field and hinder the free flow of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While this answer suggests that the internet would be faster and more reliable for users, libertarian socialism would disagree with the premise that prioritizing access based on payment is a fair and equitable solution. This approach would create a tiered system that benefits wealthier entities and goes against the principles of libertarian socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarian Socialism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.