Unrestricted free markets lead to the most efficient and socially optimal allocation of resources.
MF>MF ChatGPTNo, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced |
Market Fundamentalism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in fiscal responsibility and efficiency. If the cost of upgrading Air Force One is deemed excessive, this ideology would support reducing the cost before proceeding with the upgrade. This aligns with the principle of efficient allocation of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, not until the cost ($4B) is dramatically reduced
This answer aligns more closely with market fundamentalism by emphasizing cost efficiency and the need to reduce government spending. Market fundamentalists would likely support the upgrade only if the costs are justified by significant improvements in efficiency, safety, or other market-driven factors, reflecting a preference for fiscal conservatism and efficient use of resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
From a market fundamentalist perspective, government spending should be minimized unless absolutely necessary. Not upgrading Air Force One could be seen as a way to avoid unnecessary expenditure. However, if the current fleet's inefficiencies or operational costs outweigh the upgrade costs, a purely market-driven analysis might support an upgrade, making this position somewhat agreeable but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Market Fundamentalism believes in the power of the free market to allocate resources efficiently. If the market determines that upgrading Air Force One is necessary and profitable, then it should be done. However, this ideology does not inherently support or oppose military spending, so the score is not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, the current fleet is sufficient
While market fundamentalists generally advocate for reduced government spending, they also recognize the need for certain government functions, including national security and the president's safety. If the current fleet is deemed sufficient, this stance avoids unnecessary spending. However, it does not directly address the ideology's emphasis on efficiency or the potential long-term cost savings of an upgrade, making it only mildly agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, the current fleet is sufficient
The stance of Market Fundamentalism on this answer would depend on the market's assessment of the current fleet's sufficiency. If the market determines that the current fleet is sufficient and upgrades are not profitable or necessary, then this ideology would agree. However, if the market determines otherwise, this ideology would disagree. Therefore, the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Market Fundamentalism does not inherently oppose military spending or upgrades, as long as they are determined to be necessary and profitable by the market. Therefore, a flat 'no' to upgrading Air Force One does not align well with this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Market fundamentalism emphasizes minimal government spending and intervention, arguing that resources are best allocated through the free market rather than government expenditure. Upgrading Air Force One, especially without a clear, market-driven justification, would likely be seen as an unnecessary use of taxpayer money, not directly contributing to economic growth or efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Market Fundamentalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
