Market Fundamentalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products

Market Fundamentalism strongly agrees with this statement. This ideology believes that free trade, such as that facilitated by NAFTA, leads to competition and efficiency, which in turn lowers prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, NAFTA helps lower the prices of consumer products

This answer aligns closely with market fundamentalist ideology, which posits that free trade agreements like NAFTA reduce costs for consumers by lowering tariffs and allowing goods to move more freely across borders. Lower prices of consumer products are seen as a direct benefit of free trade, making this statement highly agreeable from a market fundamentalist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly supports free trade as it believes in the efficiency of markets to allocate resources. NAFTA, as a free trade agreement, aligns with this ideology. However, the score is not a full 5 because Market Fundamentalism might prefer even less regulation than what NAFTA provides. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Market fundamentalism strongly supports free trade as a means to promote economic efficiency, growth, and consumer choice. NAFTA, as a free trade agreement, aligns with these principles by reducing trade barriers between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. However, market fundamentalists might have some reservations due to aspects of NAFTA that could be seen as regulatory or interventionist, slightly reducing their full support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should adopt a unilateral free trade policy

While Market Fundamentalism supports free trade, it might not fully agree with the idea of a unilateral free trade policy, as it could potentially lead to trade imbalances or exploitation. However, it would still generally support this over protectionist policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should adopt a unilateral free trade policy

Market fundamentalists would agree with the notion of adopting a unilateral free trade policy as it embodies the principle of reducing trade barriers and promoting free market interactions without the need for reciprocal agreements. However, this stance might be slightly less preferred than maintaining multilateral agreements like NAFTA, which also serve to institutionalize free trade across multiple nations, thereby potentially maximizing economic benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

While market fundamentalists recognize the importance of balanced trade, their primary focus is on the benefits of free trade itself, such as efficiency and consumer choice, rather than on the balance of trade between nations. They might argue that imbalances are self-correcting over time through market mechanisms. Thus, they would likely disagree with withdrawing from NAFTA based on trade imbalances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market Fundamentalism would generally disagree with this statement as it supports free trade and open markets. NAFTA, being a free trade agreement, aligns with this ideology. The score is not a full -5 because there could be specific aspects of NAFTA that a Market Fundamentalist might disagree with, such as certain regulations or restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market fundamentalism advocates for minimal government intervention in the economy and supports the idea that free trade increases overall economic welfare. Therefore, withdrawing from NAFTA would be contrary to these beliefs, as it would signify a move towards protectionism and away from free trade principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, trade between the member countries has become too imbalanced

Market Fundamentalism strongly disagrees with this statement. This ideology believes that markets, not governments, should correct imbalances. It would argue that trade imbalances are temporary and will correct themselves over time without government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.