Natural Rights

Very strongly agree

No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity

This answer aligns most closely with the Natural Rights ideology, as it balances the protection of individual liberties with the need for national security. Requiring a warrant and probable cause ensures that the government respects the Fourth Amendment and only collects data when there is a legitimate reason to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Natural Rights ideology would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to protect individual liberties and privacy. The collection of metadata without a warrant or probable cause would be seen as an infringement on these rights. However, the score is not a 5 because some proponents of Natural Rights may acknowledge the need for limited surveillance in specific circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and abolish the NSA

Although the Natural Rights ideology values individual liberties and privacy, completely abolishing the NSA would be seen as an extreme measure. Some proponents of Natural Rights may acknowledge the need for a national security agency, but would advocate for strict oversight and adherence to the Fourth Amendment to protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists

While tracking suspected terrorists is a valid concern, the Natural Rights ideology would argue that basic data collection without a warrant or probable cause infringes on individual liberties and privacy. The Fourth Amendment is a key component of Natural Rights philosophy, and this answer does not adequately address the need for proper legal procedures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Natural Rights ideology emphasizes the protection of individual liberties and privacy. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata without any restrictions would be seen as a violation of these rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, is a key component of Natural Rights philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.