Neo-Libertarianism

Strongly agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism, while advocating for minimal government intervention, also strongly supports the rule of law and the integrity of institutions. This includes the Supreme Court, which should be free from any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise its impartiality. Therefore, Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with prohibiting justices from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Neo-Libertarians would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that Supreme Court justices should be allowed to engage in financial transactions that could potentially compromise their impartiality. This goes against the Neo-Libertarian principle of maintaining the integrity of institutions and the rule of law. While they advocate for individual freedom and minimal government intervention, this does not extend to allowing potential corruption or conflicts of interest within the judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.